Skip to main content

Finding A Spouse

When I was in Winona last week, I had a discusion with a bright young lady about the issues in finding 'the' spouse.

I'm writing this article so I won't forget some of the more salient points.

  1. Develop a good wide Catholic perspective by study and a strong spiritual life.  In this manner you will develop the peace of soul in order to see the path of salvation that God has laid out for you. 
    1. This may be marriage, in which case there will be a person that you will encounter on that path.
    2. This may be for a religious vocation, in which case the person is God.
  2. Be comfortable in your skin, so to speak.
    1. Being patient and open to Divine Providence is the key.
  3. Work more on 'being the right one' and not 'finding the right one'.
  4. Listen to your parents and mature friends who can provide a more objective assessment of the merits of a particular person.
  5. You aren't looking for a perfect 'match', ideally you should marry a person whose strengths make up for your weaknesses, and vice-versa. They should be able to help you work on your weaknesses as you should help them with theirs.
Ok, I think I caught the main points - #1 was new for me and popped into my head during the discussion.  #5 was also new, but I've known it intuitively for many years.

On the drive back to the camp ground, I occured to me that finding a spouse has a strong similarity to Herzberg's Hygiene theory.

This is a motivational theory that contains primarily two elements:
  • Motivators (e.g. challenging work, recognition, responsibility) that give positive satisfaction, arising from intrinsic conditions of the job itself, such as recognition, achievement, or personal growth,[4] and
  • Hygiene factors (e.g. status, job security, salary, fringe benefits, work conditions) that do not give positive satisfaction, though dissatisfaction results from their absence. These are extrinsic to the work itself, and include aspects such as company policies, supervisory practices, or wages/salary.[4][5]
Essentially, hygiene factors are needed to ensure an employee is not dissatisfied. Motivation factors are needed to motivate an employee to higher performance. Herzberg also further classified our actions and how and why we do them, for example, if you perform a work related action because you have to then that is classed as "movement", but if you perform a work related action because you want to then that is classed as "motivation".

Source

Once 'hygiene' factors are in place, they don't really motivate a person. In a similar manner, there are (or should be) basic criteria that a spouse should possess prior to even considering them as anything more than an acquaintance. If a person falls below this 'bar' they are a non-starter. Likewise, if a person just has the 'hygiene' factors in a relationship, there is no 'motivation' to grow the relationship - very dangerous ground even for a Catholic.

From a relationship point of view 'hygiene' factors can include elements such as Faith, Family background, financial situation.  These are ones that people are used to listing off when making a 'checklist' for a prospective spouse. I don't want to make it sound like this is not important, it is important as a baseline. Keep in mind that picking a person to spend the rest of your natural life with (assuming you outlive them) is a serious issue that will have a major influence on the eternal salvation of your soul.

Motivational factors in a relationship are trickier to determine. Does this person have strengths that counter balance your weaknesses? Do they want to help you save your soul? Do they have a mature spiritual life?  Are they mature?

Once you've developed this list - it would be useful to turn the microscope on yourself. How do you measure up? What should you be doing to make yourself 'the one'? 

For myself, I can look back and see the finger of God grooming me to be 'the one' for my wife. All of the important work that God undertook was interior. First he had to deepen my heart so that I could love deeply (a generic problem for men ...). Second, he providentially helped me to remove a number of barriers in my spiritual life.  Thirdly, he deepened my spiritual life.

So to sum up:

  1. Have clear ideas of the 'hygiene factors' that need to be in place before you'll consider a relationship with a prospective spouse.
  2. Have clear ideas of the 'motivational factors' that need to be present to get to the next step.
  3. Have a deep spiritual life that allows you to see the path that God has set out for you to walk on for your own salvation.
  4. Look at yourself in all humility and work on making yourself worthy of the person that God has chosen to be your help in life so that you make help them in return.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized mass (ie the Novus Ordo Missae

Regarding Post: Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer no longer ... now Bishop Joseph Pfeiffer (Can't see this being a problem...)

 + JMJ   I've been watching the popularity of the post about Fr. Pfeiffer's attempted episcopal consecration and its continued top listing on the 'popular posts' list at the bottom of posts.  After some thought, I decided that I don't want to be responsible for anyone joining Fr. Pfeiffer's 'group', however unlikely that would be at this time. So I have reverted the article to the draft state. If anyone wants it reinstated, I would ask that they comment on this post with a rationale for reinstatement. P^3

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.

CMTV's Latest Attempt to Slag the SSPX

 + JMJ   It has been a couple of months since the last significant attempt to slag the SSPX and I was beginning to wonder if the clicks were subsiding.   ... then another article popped up this week.   I was wondering if it would contain a new case or simply repeat old allegations and FUD and Ms. Niles did not disappoint.  A technique that I learned in dealing with negotiations and conflicts is to review the correspondence with a critical eye and black out all irrelevant contents. This helps to remove all the distracting attacks, innuendos, assumptions, and FUD from view so a person can focus on the important aspects ... like the facts. How much of Ms.Niles text survived my review? About 17.5% or 347 words out of ~1983. The rest was either repeated information or opinion as opposed to fact.  Just in case you are curious as to what that looks like, I have attached the blacked out document at the end of this post. Now on to a review of the words that actually bore on the case at hand ...